DLC Logo

Digital Library of the Commons

Home Browse Search User Services Submit a Document About Help








Informal Cooperation in the Commons? Evidence from a Survey of Australian Farmers Facing Irrigation Salinity

Marshall, Graham R. 2000. "Informal Cooperation in the Commons? Evidence from a Survey of Australian Farmers Facing Irrigation Salinity." Presented at "Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millenium", the Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, May 31-June 4.

Full text available as:
PDF

Abstract


"Land and water management plans developed for the four irrigation districts surrounding Deniliquin in the River Murray catchment are said to be at the leading-edge of Australian institutional innovations for integrated resource management. Farmers have been strongly involved in the development of the Plans and in deliberations regarding their implementation. Implementation accountabilities have been devolved to Murray Irrigation Limited, a company wholly owned by its irrigator customers. The plans primarily focus on an emerging tragedy of the commons, with the area's soils are predicted to become increasingly degraded by salinisation unless local cooperation is achieved in limiting watertable recharge. The irrigator-owned company can thus be regarded as a common property regime insofar as its watertable management function is concerned.

"The community ownership rhetoric behind these institutional developments seems to signify an attempt to come to terms with the high, often prohibitive, transaction costs typically associated with formal governance of a common-pool resource. The reasoning appears to be that local human and social capital is the key to finding institutional arrangements which realise the potential of local informal capacity for self-organisation and thereby lessen the need for formal governance.

"In an effort to go beyond anecdotal evidence of the alleged contribution of the informal in this instance, a face- to-face survey of 235 farm businesses was undertaken. This allowed the influence of various products of social capital, including trust, reciprocity and norms, on both farmer commitment to, and intention to comply with, their district's plan to be tested statistically. Findings are discussed in the paper."

Document Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:IASCP
common pool resources--Australia
agriculture--Australia
soil conservation--Australia
irrigation--Australia
surveys--Australia
community participation--Australia
salinization
institutional analysis--Australia
social capital--Australia
institutional economics
transaction costs
reciprocity
ID Code:298

 

This is an open-access digital library and archive.
Copyright for DLC documents is retained by the authors.
Use and distribution by you is subject to citation of the original source.
Questions or Comments: Email to Digital Library of the Commons
Copyright 2003, The Trustees of Indiana University