DLC Logo

Digital Library of the Commons

Home Browse Search User Services Submit a Document About Help








Transboundary Environmental Governance in the Mekong River Basin: Civil Society Spaces for Transboundary Participation

Woods, Kevin. 2003. "Transboundary Environmental Governance in the Mekong River Basin: Civil Society Spaces for Transboundary Participation." Presented at "Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices", Chiang Mai, Thailand, July 11-14, 2003.

Full text available as:
PDF

Abstract

From Pages 1 and 2:

"'New regionalism' promoted in mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) integrates the riparian nations into a coordinated Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). The GMS framework establishes the foundation for transboundary environmental governance among bilateral international donors, regional institutions, state apparatuses and local communities. With increasing market neo-liberalization to foster inter-state trading relations and concomitant development projects and natural resource exploitation, environmental concerns begin to take precedence. The Mekong River best represents the inter-relationships among nation-states, and embodies the conflict and connectedness among and within the different geopolitical scales. The geo- and cultural-politics, history and political economy of the different riparian nations must be taken into account when addressing environmental governance mechanisms. With increased regional integration, spaces for local communities become wedged between situated livelihoods and beyond national borders. Development projects in the Mekong River basin create new local and regional boundaries, inventing transnational communities. Thus spaces of maneuverability for local people become blurred and more complex by being affected by transnational environmental degradation but without regional representation to take action. The focus of this paper is on the ability for transboundary environmental governance to create avenues of action for local communities to participate in transboundary decision-making. Public participation in the regional decision-making process remains problematic as local communities constitute complexity with divergent, dynamic viewpoints. The research variables analyzed include geo-and cultural-politics, regional institutions and environmental governance mechanisms, such as transparency and access to information, accountability and public participation."

Document Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:IASCP
common pool resources
Mekong River region
transboundary resources
civil society
regionalism
ID Code:1110

 

This is an open-access digital library and archive.
Copyright for DLC documents is retained by the authors.
Use and distribution by you is subject to citation of the original source.
Questions or Comments: Email to Digital Library of the Commons
Copyright 2003, The Trustees of Indiana University