DLC Logo

Digital Library of the Commons

Home Browse Search User Services Submit a Document About Help








Forest Peoples, Customary Use and State Forests: The Case for Reform

Colchester, Marcus et al. 2006. "Forest Peoples, Customary Use and State Forests: The Case for Reform." Presented at "Survival of the Commons: Mounting Challenges and New Realities," the Eleventh Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bali, Indonesia, June 19-23, 2006.

Full text available as:
PDF

Abstract

Co-Authors:
Silva Monterrey, Nalua
Tomedes, Ramon
Zaalman, Henry
Kumanajare, Georgette
Biswana, Louis
Watalmaleo, Grace
Barend, Michel
Oeloekanamoe, Sylvia
Majarawai, Steven
Galgren, Harold
Kambel, Ellen-Rose
de Jong, Caroline
Tchoumba, Belmond
Nelson, John
Handja, George Thierry
Nounah, Stephen
Minsolo, Emmanuel
David, Beryl
Isaacs, Percival
Johnny, Angelbert
Johnson, Larry
Pugsley, Maxi
Ramacindo, Claudine
Winter, Gavin
Winter, Yolanda
Poole, Peter
Griffiths, Tom
MacKay, Fergus
Farhan Ferrari, Maurizio

"Worldwide an estimated 1.6 billion people depend on forests for their daily livelihoods. Though sound data are lacking, about half of these are long term residents who manage their lands and forests according to customary law. Forestry laws tend to classify and zone forests as State forest areas and ignore or deny customary rights in forests or subordinate customary use to the interests of concessionaires and large scale users. However, international human rights laws, forest policies, conservation norms and environmental laws now place significant obligations on governments to revise their forest management regimes to accommodate the claims of customary law communities. Moreover, widespread mobilization of forest-dependent peoples pressing for recognition of their rights, has triggered significant legal reforms in some countries.

"Drawing on five long-term case studies carried out by the Forest Peoples Programme with indigenous peoples' organisations in Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, Cameroon, and Thailand, the paper summarises new field data which reveal the remarkable complexity of customary law systems and how the narrowing gap, between countries' obligations under international law and national laws, can be bridged. All these countries are party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), a relatively new piece of international law that is not yet well understood or implemented. The study thus looks in particular at what these countries need to do to meet their obligations under CBD Article 10c, by which States party to the treaty should 'protect and encourage the customary use of biological resources in accordance with traditional cultural practices.'

"Drawing on these practical experiences, the paper proposes a methodology for identifying customary use, strengthening traditional practices to ensure sustainable use and ensuring that State laws, policies and practices align with countries' obligations under the CBD and other relevant international treaties."

Document Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:IASCP
indigenous institutions--Venezuela--case study
forest policy--Venezuela--case study
indigenous institutions--Guyana--case study
forest policy--Guyana--case study
indigenous institutions--Suriname--case study
forest policy--Suriname--case study
indigenous institutions--Thailand--case study
forest policy--Thailand--case study
indigenous institutions--Cameroon--case study
forest policy--Cameroon--case study
ID Code:1865

 

This is an open-access digital library and archive.
Copyright for DLC documents is retained by the authors.
Use and distribution by you is subject to citation of the original source.
Questions or Comments: Email to Digital Library of the Commons
Copyright 2003, The Trustees of Indiana University