hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Strengthening the Food Systems Governance Evidence Base: Supporting Commensurability of Research through a Systematic Review of Methods

Show full item record

Type: Working Paper
Author: Delaney, Aogán; Evans, Tom; McGreevy, John; Blekking, Jordan; Schlachter, Tyler; Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa; Tamás, Peter A.; Crane, Todd A.; Eakin, Hallie; Förch, Wiebke; Jones, Lindsey; Nelson, Donald R.; Oberlack, Christoph; Purdon, Mark
Date: 2016
Agency: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
Series: CCAFS Working Papers no. 167
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10535/10114
Sector: Theory
Region:
Subject(s): evaluation
governance and politics
Abstract: "Governance of food systems is a poorly understood determinant of food security. Much scholarship on food systems governance is non-empirical, while existing research is often case study-based and theoretically and methodologically incommensurable. This frustrates aggregation of evidence and generalisation. We undertook a systematic review of methods used in food systems governance research with a view to identifying a core set of indicators for future research. We gathered literature through a structured consultation and sampling from recent reviews. Indicators were identified and classified according to the levels and sectors they investigate. We found a concentration of indicators in food production at local to national levels and a sparseness in distribution and consumption. Unsurprisingly, many indicators of institutional structure were found, while agency-related indicators are moderately represented. We call for piloting and validation of these indicators and for methodological development to fill gaps identified. These efforts are expected to support a more consolidated future evidence base and eventual meta-analysis."

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
retrieve[1].pdf 1.497Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show full item record