| dc.contributor.author |
Choe, Hyun |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2019-09-18T18:30:19Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2019-09-18T18:30:19Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2019 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/10607 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"Ostrom's commons theory is based on the erroneous premise that differences in the
resource management method originate from the physical attributes of resources such as
subtractability and non excludability. Thus, the theory fails to exp lain that the same
resource may become private goods and toll goods, or common pool resources and public
goods depending on the social conditions. Commons must be defined not by physical
attributes but by social ones. In this study, rivalry and legitimacy of monopoly are
presented as the criteria for resource classification instead of subtractability and non
excludability. Mor eover, it was found through sea fields management in Jeju that
legitimacy of monopoly is evaluated by the golden rule, more specifica lly the principle
of fairness and respect for human life." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
commons |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
common pool resources |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Commons, the Golden Rule and Sea Fi elds in Jeju Jeju |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Conference Paper |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
unpublished |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.region |
East Asia |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.country |
South Korea |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
General & Multiple Resources |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconference |
In Defense of the Commons: Challenges, Innovation and Action, the Seventeenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfdates |
July 1-5 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfloc |
Lima, Peru |
en_US |