|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Journal Article |
|
Author:
|
Wheeler, Bella; Williams, Oli; Meakin, Becki; Chambers, Eleni; Beresford, Peter; O'Brien, Sarah; Robert, Glenn; Robert, Glenn |
|
Journal:
|
Research Involvement and Engagement |
|
Volume:
|
10 |
|
Page(s):
|
1-16 |
|
Date:
|
2024 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/10916
|
|
Sector:
|
Social Organization
Theory |
|
Region:
|
Europe |
|
Subject(s):
|
research
evaluation
methodology
case study
|
|
Abstract:
|
"Some research has been undertaken into the mechanisms that shape successful participatory approaches in the context of efforts to improve health and social care. However, greater attention needs to be directed to how partnerships between researchers and user-led organisations (ULOs) might best be formed, practiced, managed, and assessed. We explored whether political economist Elinor Ostrom’s Nobel prize winning analysis of common pool resource management—specifically eight principles to enhance collaborative group working
as derived from her empirical research—could be usefully applied within a user-led project aiming to co-design new services to support more inclusive involvement of Disabled people in decision-making processes in policy and practice. Participant observation and participatory methods over a 16-month period comprising observational notes of online user-led meetings (26 h), online study team meetings (20 h), online Joint Interpretive Forum meetings
(8 h), and semi-structured one-to-one interviews with project participants (44 h) at two time points (months 6 and 10). Initially it proved difficult to establish working practices informed by Ostrom’s principles for collaborative group working within the user-led project. Several attempts were made to put a structure in place that met the needs of both the research study and the aims of the user-led project, but this was not straightforward. An important shift saw a move away from directly applying the principles to the working practices of the group and instead applying them to specific tasks the group were undertaking. This was a helpful realisation which enabled the principles to become—for most but not all participants—a useful facilitation device in the latter stages of the project. Eventually we applied the principles in a way that was useful and enabled collaboration between researchers and a ULO (albeit in unexpected ways).
|