hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Rural Governance in Post-1994 South Africa: Has the Question of Citizenship for Rural Inhabitants been Settled 10 Years in South Africa's Democracy?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ntsebeza, Lungisile en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:44:25Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:44:25Z
dc.date.issued 2004 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2004-12-03 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2004-12-03 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2319
dc.description.abstract "Against the background of rural local governance that was dominated by apartheid created authoritarian Tribal Authorities, the post- 1994 South African state has committed itself to the establishment of an accountable, democratic and effective form of governance throughout the country, including rural areas falling under the jurisdiction of traditional authorities (chiefs of various ranks). However, I argue that the promulgation of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act and the Communal Land Rights Bill (CLRB) runs the risk of compromising this project. The Framework Act establishes traditional councils which are dominated by unelected traditional authorities and their appointees, while the CLRB gives these structures unprecedented powers over land administration and allocation. This raises, I argue, serious questions about the meaning of democracy and citizenship in post-1994, in particular for rural people. Rural citizens do not seem to enjoy the same rights as their urban counterparts who elect their leaders. Against the background of rural local governance that was dominated by apartheid created authoritarian Tribal Authorities, the post-1994 South African state has committed itself to the establishment of an accountable, democratic and effective form of governance throughout the country, including rural areas falling under the jurisdiction of traditional authorities (chiefs of various ranks). However, I argue that the promulgation of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act and the Communal Land Rights Bill (CLRB) runs the risk of compromising this project. The Framework Act establishes traditional councils which are dominated by unelected traditional authorities and their appointees, while the CLRB gives these structures unprecedented powers over land administration and allocation. This raises, I argue, serious questions about the meaning of democracy and citizenship in post-1994, in particular for rural people. Rural citizens do not seem to enjoy the same rights as their urban counterparts who elect their leaders." en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.subject rural affairs en_US
dc.subject citizenship en_US
dc.subject democracy en_US
dc.subject state and local governance en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use en_US
dc.subject legislation en_US
dc.title Rural Governance in Post-1994 South Africa: Has the Question of Citizenship for Rural Inhabitants been Settled 10 Years in South Africa's Democracy? en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.coverage.region Africa en_US
dc.coverage.country South Africa en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Land Tenure & Use en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference The Commons in an Age of Global Transition: Challenges, Risks and Opportunities, the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates August 9-13 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Oaxaca, Mexico en_US
dc.submitter.email yinjin@indiana.edu en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Ntsebeza_Rural_040512_Paper033a.pdf 226.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record