hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Building Robustness to Disturbance: Governance in Southern African Peace Parks

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schoon, Michael L.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-13T14:16:15Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5173
dc.description.abstract "Transboundary conservation has gained currency over the past decade as an effective means for achieving a wide array of goals ranging from improved biodiversity conservation to regional economic development to the promotion of peace between countries. Studies to analyze these competing claims oscillate between views of transboundary protected areas (TPBAs) as panaceas that can solve wide-ranging societal challenges in any type of setting to studies that view them as idiosyncratic entities with no generalizable traits, and few studies assess institutional arrangements for governance. This study, by contrast, uses 150 key informant interviews within two TBPAs in southern Africa the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park in Botswana and South Africa and the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe to address analytically how different governance structures of transboundary protected areas maintain robustness in response to various types of disturbance. "The insights arise from the fundamentally different institutional development paths of the two cases. This study argues that that the bottom-up institutional development and the slow, unforced evolution of governance in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park have allowed governing bodies to learn how to adapt and respond to transformations in the social-ecological system from an operational level. By contrast, institutional development in the Great Limpopo has struggled operationally due to the top-down imposition of the park on local-level communities and officials and the short time horizons permitted for goal attainment. However, top-down park formation has resulted in other accomplishments, primarily in bridging international boundaries. The central premise is that the national-level commitment to the Great Limpopo results in greater degrees of cooperation at a policy level than in a park that develops from the bottom-up. Such high levels of policy cooperation without parallel gains in operational cooperation have led to unexpected challenges in the Great Limpopo." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject parks en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use en_US
dc.subject biodiversity en_US
dc.subject conservation en_US
dc.subject economic development en_US
dc.subject transboundary disputes en_US
dc.subject protected areas en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.title Building Robustness to Disturbance: Governance in Southern African Peace Parks en_US
dc.type Thesis or Dissertation en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.publisher.workingpaperseries Indiana University en_US
dc.type.thesistype Ph.D Dissertation en_US
dc.coverage.region Africa en_US
dc.subject.sector General & Multiple Resources en_US
dc.subject.sector Global Commons en_US
dc.subject.sector Land Tenure & Use en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
out.pdf 9.410Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record