| dc.contributor.author |
Williamson, Dean V. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-09-23T15:12:28Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-09-23T15:12:28Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/6376 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"The intersection of antitrust and intellectual property circumscribes two century-long debates. The first pertains to questions about how antitrust law and intellectual property law interact, and the second pertains to questions about how parties can exploit property rights, including intellectual property rights, to exclude competitors. This iBrief finesses these questions and turns to practical considerations about how innovation and intellectual property can impinge antitrust enforcement. This iBrief develops two propositions. First, although collaborative research and development has often been and remains unwittingly misunderstood, what is understood about it is consistent with the long-standing observation that antitrust has rarely interfered with collaborative ventures. Second, shifting focus from 'intellectual property rights' to 'uncertain property rights' makes it easier to understand what innovation and intellectual property imply for enforcement processes. Both intellectual property and tangible assets imply the same processes, but the boundaries of intellectual properties may be uncertain and may, in turn, allow parties to game enforcement processes in ways that would not be feasible in antitrust matters that principally feature tangible assets. Even so, uncertain property rights might not frustrate enforcement processes as the antitrust authorities may yet be able to factor parties’ strategic behaviors into the design of antitrust remedies." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
intellectual property rights |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
innovation |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
collaboration |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
research |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Antitrust, Innovation, and Uncertain Property Rights: Some Practical Considerations |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Information & Knowledge |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationjournal |
Duke Law and Technology Review |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationvolume |
1 |
en_US |