| dc.contributor.author |
Komakech, Hans C. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Van Der Zaag, Pieter |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-01-19T20:57:17Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2012-01-19T20:57:17Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/7792 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
We find that the emergence of the RCs can be understood by using the concept of institutional bricolage. We then assess their effective functioning with the help of the eight design principles proposed by Ostrom and find that the best performing RC largely complied with five of them, which indicates that not all principles are necessary for a water institution to be effective and to endure over time. The other two studied RCs complied with only three of these principles. All RCs leave the resource boundary open to negotiation, which lowers the transaction cost of controlling the boundaries and also allows future demands to be met in the face of increasing resource variability. All RCs do not fully comply with the principle that all affected must take part in rule creation and modification. In all three cases, finally, the 'nesting' of lower-level institutional arrangements within higher-level ones is inconsistent. To explain the difference in the performance of the three RCs we need to consider factors related to heterogeneity. We find that the functioning of RCs is strongly influenced by group size, spatial distance, heterogeneity of users and uses, and market forces." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
common pool resources |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
design principles |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
heterogeneity |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
water management |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
conflict |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Pangani River |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Understanding the Emergence and Functioning of River Committees in a Catchment of the Pangani Basin, Tanzania |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.region |
Africa |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.country |
Tanzania |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Social Organization |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Water Resource & Irrigation |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationjournal |
Water Alternatives |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationvolume |
4 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationpages |
197-222 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationnumber |
2 |
en_US |