hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Sharing Information or Captured Heritage: Access to Community Geographic Knowledge and the State's Responsibility to Protect Aboriginal Rights in British Columbia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Weinstein, Martin en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:32:21Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:32:21Z
dc.date.issued 1998 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2001-07-02 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2001-07-02 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/805
dc.description.abstract "Community knowledge plays a critical role in common property resource management regimes. Knowledge and information are obvious requirements for any type of resource management. Less obvious is the role that access to information plays in the ability to restrict access in otherwise open or shared-access common property resource (CPR) regimes. Indeed, in some informal (as opposed to de jure) CPR regimes, control of the flow of knowledge is the primary mechanism through which access to resources is restricted to outsiders. "The findings of the lower courts in the seminal Delgammuukw case (Supreme Court of B.C. 1991; Court of Appeals for B.C. 1993) placed a fiduciary duty on the provincial government to ensure that aboriginal rights are not 'unjustifiably infringed upon by the resource development activities of the Crown, or its licensees' (B.C. Ministry Forests 1995). To honour this responsibility, the B.C. government began a major collaboration with aboriginal communities throughout the province. Provincial agencies, most notably, the Ministry of Forests, have been funding community-mapping programs, so called Traditional Use Studies (TUS). Under the TUS program, aboriginal communities are mapping their own knowledge of cultural and resource geography. "Conflicts, however, have emerged over the sharing or use of the TUS data. The nature of these conflicts indicates that there are fundamentally different understandings about information and its role. The province proposes that TUS map data, without descriptions of their meaning or significance, be housed in a government database, directly accessible for agency planning and for a first stage review of developement plans. Aboriginal parties, on the other hand, find the risk of allowing this information to leave their hands unacceptable. Instead of honouring a fiduciary duty, the sharing structure has given the TUS program an appearance of information capture, with a possible consequence of placing the rights it intended to protect under greater risk." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.subject common pool resources en_US
dc.subject information dissemination en_US
dc.subject geography en_US
dc.subject local knowledge en_US
dc.subject indigenous institutions en_US
dc.subject Native Americans en_US
dc.subject resource management en_US
dc.subject mapping en_US
dc.title Sharing Information or Captured Heritage: Access to Community Geographic Knowledge and the State's Responsibility to Protect Aboriginal Rights in British Columbia en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.coverage.country Canada
dc.subject.sector Information & Knowledge en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Crossing Boundaries, the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates June 10-14 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Vancouver, BC, Canada en_US
dc.submitter.email hess@indiana.edu en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
weinstei.pdf 46.03Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record