hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Sitting on the Fence? Policies and Practices in Managing Human-wildfire Conflict in Limpopo Province, South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Anthony, Brandon P.
dc.contributor.author Scott, Peter
dc.contributor.author Antypas, Alexios
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-21T20:08:28Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-21T20:08:28Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10535/8305
dc.description.abstract "Human-wildlife conflicts are the product of socio-economic and political landscapes and are contentious because the resources have economic value and species are often high profile and legally protected. Within a governance framework, we detail institutional roles and the effectiveness of policies and practices of controlling damage-causing animals (DCAs)at Kruger National Park (KNP) and Limpopo Province along KNP's western border. Most DCAs originate from the park, significantly affecting its long-term legitimacy among local communities. Between 2002 and 2004, over 12% of households within 15 km of the park experienced DCA damage, with incidents significantly correlated with being located closer to KNP and having higher numbers of mammalian livestock. These incidents are affecting opinions concerning KNP, as those who experienced damage were less likely to believe that the park would ever help their household economically. According to 482 DCA incident records from 1998 to 2004, the most problematic species are buffalo, lion, elephant, hippo and crocodile. Limpopo Province utilised professional hunters in DCA control, however, widespread abuses including the direct luring of lion led to a national moratorium on specific hunting practices. DCA procedures are highly flawed due to ambiguity concerning species and movement of DCAs, poor reporting, inadequate response times, overlapping responsibilities, and corruption. These are exacerbated by weak and, in some cases, competing institutions. Further, the controversial issue of undelivered compensation is determining negative attitudes by communities towards institutions who have historically promised it. Drawing on good governance principles, we offer recommendations on alleviating DCA conflicts in such contexts." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject poaching en_US
dc.subject compensation en_US
dc.subject conservation--policy en_US
dc.subject human-environment interaction en_US
dc.subject Kruger National Park en_US
dc.title Sitting on the Fence? Policies and Practices in Managing Human-wildfire Conflict in Limpopo Province, South Africa en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region Africa en_US
dc.coverage.country South Africa en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Wildlife en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Conservation and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 8 en_US
dc.identifier.citationpages 225-240 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 3 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Sitting on the ... uman-wildlife Conflict.pdf 1.383Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record