hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management: Implications for Knowledge Integration and Social-Ecological System Sustainability

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hill, Rosemary
dc.contributor.author Grant, Chrissy
dc.contributor.author George, Melissa
dc.contributor.author Robinson, Catherine J.
dc.contributor.author Jackson, Sue
dc.contributor.author Abel, Nick
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-23T20:25:30Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-23T20:25:30Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10535/8324
dc.description.abstract "Indigenous peoples now engage with many decentralized approaches to environmental management that offer opportunities for integration of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge (IEK) and western science to promote cultural diversity in the management of social-ecological system sustainability. Nevertheless, processes of combining IEK with western science are diverse and affected by numerous factors, including the adaptive co-management context, the intrinsic characteristics of the natural resources, and the governance systems. We present a typology of Indigenous engagement in environmental management, derived through comparative analysis of 21 Australian case studies, and consider its implications for the integration of IEK with western science. Sociological and rational choice institutionalism underpin our analytical framework, which differentiates on three axes: (1) power sharing, incorporating decision making, rules definition, resource values and property rights; (2) participation, incorporating participatory processes, organizations engaged, and coordination approaches; (3) intercultural purpose, incorporating purposes of environmental management, Indigenous engagement, Indigenous development and capacity building. Our typology groups engagement into four types: Indigenous governed collaborations; Indigenous-driven cogovernance; agency-driven co-governance; and agency governance. From our analysis of manifestations of knowledge integration across the types, we argue that Indigenous governance and Indigenous-driven co-governance provides better prospects for integration of IEK and western science for sustainability of social-ecological systems. Supporting Indigenous governance without, or with only a limited requirement for power sharing with other agencies sustains the distinct Indigenous cultural purposes underpinning IEK, and benefits knowledge integration. We conclude by advocating that the typology be applied to test its general effectiveness in guiding practitioners and researchers to develop robust governance for Indigenous knowledge integration in environmental management." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject indigenous knowledge en_US
dc.subject integration en_US
dc.subject natural resources en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.subject resource management en_US
dc.subject environmental policy en_US
dc.title A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management: Implications for Knowledge Integration and Social-Ecological System Sustainability en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region Pacific and Australia en_US
dc.coverage.country Australia en_US
dc.subject.sector General & Multiple Resources en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 17 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 1 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
A Typology of I ... vironmental Management.pdf 417.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record