hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

REDD+ for the Poor for REDD+? About the Limitations of Environmental Policies in the Amazon and the Potential of Achieving Environmental Goals Through Pro-Poor Policies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pokorny, Benno
dc.contributor.author Scholz, Imme
dc.contributor.author de Jong, Wil
dc.date.accessioned 2013-06-20T16:58:13Z
dc.date.available 2013-06-20T16:58:13Z
dc.date.issued 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/8858
dc.description.abstract "Once again, the international community focuses on the preservation of Amazonian forests, in particular through a bundle of initiatives grouped under the term of REDD+. Initially focusing on reducing carbon emissions, the REDD+ process became increasingly linked with developmental goals that represent the primary interest of all Amazon countries. In consequence, REDD+ can be seen as another attempt to achieve the twin goals of environmental protection and rural development, and consequently, relies on the strategies and tools of past efforts. Against this background, we explore past experiences with key strategies for environmental protection and poverty alleviation in the Amazon to critically reflect about the potential of REDD+ to contribute to sustainable local development in the region. The analysis demonstrates that initiatives that pursued environmental goals mostly led to more restrictions and bureaucratic barriers to local forest users, while the prevailing approaches to promote rural dwellers showed ambivalent environmental outcomes. Reasons for these unsatisfactory results include the sectoral alignment of the measures and the poor coordination and lack of coherence with decisive policy areas. Most critically, the environmental and social initiatives themselves rely on the classic development approach widely disregarding smallholders' capacities to contribute to local development. The manifold pilot activities emerging under the new REDD+ framework tend to repeat these shortcomings, thereby further accelerating the replacement of local socio-productive schemes with unsustainable land uses. In view of the growing consensus about the ecological incompatibility, social limitations and economic risks of classic development, an alternative vision of development is needed, which more consciously takes into account the immense social and environmental potential of the region. Considering that REDD+ is still at the start, there might be possibilities to re-adjust the framework and thereby turn it into a real contribution to the sustainable development of rural Amazon." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject forest management en_US
dc.subject poverty alleviation en_US
dc.subject REDD en_US
dc.subject rural development en_US
dc.subject sustainability en_US
dc.subject Amazon River region en_US
dc.title REDD+ for the Poor for REDD+? About the Limitations of Environmental Policies in the Amazon and the Potential of Achieving Environmental Goals Through Pro-Poor Policies en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region South America en_US
dc.subject.sector Forestry en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 18 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 2 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2012-5458.pdf 124.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record