|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Journal Article |
|
Author:
|
Hajjar, Reem F.; Kozak, Robert A.; Innes, John L. |
|
Journal:
|
Ecology and Society |
|
Volume:
|
1 |
|
Page(s):
|
|
|
Date:
|
2012 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/9130
|
|
Sector:
|
Forestry |
|
Region:
|
Central America & Caribbean
South America |
|
Subject(s):
|
community forestry
decentralization
forest management
|
|
Abstract:
|
"Decentralization of forest governance has been promoted as a way to conserve forests more effectively, while also improving rural and forest-dependent livelihoods. Prior to assessing the consequences of this decentralization trend, there is a need to critically examine the degree to which decentralization of forest management decision making is actually happening. In particular, it is unclear whether communities are securing legal authority and/or decision-making power over the forests on which they depend. This study uses case studies of community forestry in Brazil and Mexico to examine the amount of decisionmaking power communities and smallholders have received over forest resources. A framework for assessment is developed that identifies criteria of relevance to community members rights and day-to-day activities. We found that in both countries the government maintains significant control over forest resources through heavy regulation of extraction, but that communities have increasing control over day-to-day forest management decisions. We conclude by posing questions on the appropriate levels of decentralization for optimal outcomes."
|