Digital Library of the CommonsIndiana University Libraries
Browse DLC
Links
All of DLC
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Cuasay, Peter"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Paper
    Indigenizing Law or Legalizing Governmentality? The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act and the Philippine Supreme Court
    (2003) Cuasay, Peter
    "I will trace this interaction in the Philippine Supreme Court case of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) to contrast two possible hybrids. In the first, some separation is maintained between imperium and dominium, creating a disinterested, even moral objectivity which can be recalled in an effort to redress historic grievances. In the second, opposing view, dominium substitutes for imperium, and collective national interest theoretically prevails over the property interests. Since these outcomes reached a rough balance in the court case, which ended in a tie, I shall suggest the balance may ultimately tip in yet a third direction. With the help of a Thai example, neoliberal self-regulation can be seen as a regulated exchange between imperium and dominium, supposedly devolving ruling power down to substate agents but snatching ownership away as the cost of failing self-control. Rather than the end of sovereignty, this is a kind of endless cancellation of sovereignty which is paradoxically maintained in the act of consuming or betraying itself. Put another way, the enumerated rights in instruments like IPRA that indigenize law are one side of a coin whose other face is continued denial of the popular sovereignty which could make such rights effective. The role for indigenous knowledge is to enrich, complicate, and ultimately overload the simplistic economy of imperium and dominium by re-making the sovereignty concept."
  • Contact Info

  • Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis
    513 N. Park Avenue
    Bloomington, IN 47408
    812-855–0441
    workshop @ iu . edu
    https://ostromworkshop.indiana.edu/

  • Library Technologies
    Wells Library W501
    1320 E. Tenth Street
    Bloomington, IN 47405
    libauto @ iu . edu

  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Copyright © 2024 The Trustees of Indiana University