Browsing by Author "Groot, Annemarie"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Working Paper Demystifying Facilitation in Participatory Development(2000) Groot, Annemarie; Maarleveld, Marleen"Blueprint approaches to development have little ability to build capacities for sustainable natural resource management and food production. An emerging alternative response for democratic societies is collective action of multiple actors at multiple scales. Participatory methodologies have evolved to develop competence in joint decision-making, action and reflection. However, despite promising results, we are still not very good at incorporating multiple actor learning at multiple scales into participatory interventions. The importance of facilitation in this regard is increasingly acknowledged. However, little has been written to guide facilitators on the qualities needed and theories surrounding its actual practice. Based on their own facilitation experience, the authors aim to make facilitation and the role of the facilitator more transparent by highlighting three different aspects of participatory interventions: 1. The reasons for the participatory intervention; 2. The range of stakeholders involved; 3. The style of facilitation. For each of these three choices, a number of options and their consequences for facilitation of the learning process and its outcome are presented."Book Learning Our Way Ahead: Navigating Institutional Change and Agricultural Decentralisation(2001) Lightfoot, Clive; Ramírez, Ricardo; Groot, Annemarie; Noble, Reg; Alders, Carine; Shao, Francis; Kisauzi, Dan; Bekalo, Isaac"The current move towards decentralisation and privatisation of agricultural services in many East African countries is requiring many organisations and individuals to 're-invent' their roles and responsibilities. Government staff at many levels, private input suppliers, farmer organisations and researchers all face the challenge of reduced government budgets whilst needing to become more responsive to the agricultural community. There are no blueprints for the new organisational and administrative arrangements. A new approach is needed which can bring together a broad range of stakeholders unaccustomed to working with each other and help them decide on the types of initiatives needed. This paper describes several experiences from East Africa and elsewhere where coalitions of different agriculture-related organisations at different levels have been using a learning process for collective planning and innovation. The learning process follows five phases: defining future agroecosystems; matching farmer demands with the services needed to create those agroecosystems; negotiating new partnerships; taking action; assessing the actions taken; and assessing the performance of new partnerships. The five phases are part of a continuous cycle, with all stakeholders constantly monitoring agroecosystem and partnership performance, identifying weaknesses and taking new action to improve performance further. The emphasis of the approach is on joint learning, since no single organisation can come up with all the solutions required and everyone stands to gain from improved co-ordination."