Digital Library of the CommonsIndiana University Libraries
Browse DLC
Links
All of DLC
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Six, Benjamin"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Paper
    Social Capital and Trust in the Design and Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action: Case Studies on IP Coordinating Mechanisms in Plant Genetic Resources and the Biomedical Sector
    (2012) Six, Benjamin; van Zimmeren, Esther; Frison, Christine
    "Intellectual property (IP) rights and in particular patents tend to occupy a prominent position in many ongoing debates about so-called 'grand challenges', such as climate change, food security, protection of biodiversity and global health. Often IP rights are regarded as 'part of the problem' and reason for limited access to fundamental products and services required to address these challenges. Public and private actors have made attempts to create collective action institutions which may assist in facilitating access to those essential technologies and services. Examples are the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources in Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) with its associated Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-Sharing and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP). However, these transnational collective action institutions generally require active and voluntary collaboration by the right owners concerned. In practice, support for these institutions appears to be limited or even declining. Empirical research has shown that a lack of trust is one of the major issues that discourages stakeholders from collaborating with these institutions. In this light, the objective of the current paper is to develop an original account of trust in the field of large scale and transnational collective action institutions. Our main research question relates to the desired structures and mechanisms within institutions for collective action, which would stimulate stakeholders to sustain trust in order to safeguard the effective operation of institutions for collective action. We claim that in various sectors and contexts stakeholders encounter difficulties in setting up an experimental institution for collective action, that is, to create structures that incite actors to find the optimal way to sustain trust, to organizationally acknowledge and learn that process and to nourish it with the precise normative idea behind the institutional apparatus."
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Journal Article
    Trust and Social Capital in the Design and Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
    (2015) Six, Benjamin; van Zimmeren, Esther; Popa, Florin; Frison, Christine
    "This paper aims at developing an original account of trust in the framework of large scale, international collective action institutions. Our research question focuses on the desired structures and mechanisms that are necessary to sustain the trust needed to uphold the effective operation of institutions for collective action. Our theoretical framework for studying trust is based on the social capital theory. Social capital is defined as the features of social organization, such as trust, networks and norms that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit. We claim that in different sectors and contexts stakeholders encounter difficulties in collaborating in setting up experimental institutions for collective action. In order to generate more collaboration, stakeholders need to create structures that incite actors to find the optimal way to sustain trust, to organizationally acknowledge and learn that process, and to nourish it with the precise normative idea behind the institutional apparatus. In the areas of plant genetic resources and biomedicine, stakeholders have encountered these difficulties while experimenting with different coordination mechanisms for dealing with the increased appropriation of knowledge through patents. Our two case studies in plant genetic resources and biomedicine reflect the idea that institutions must be understood as complex pragmatic connectors of trust, i.e. social matrices of collective action that sustain individual commitment, where routine and reflexivity drive trust-based coordination mechanisms in interaction with their environment. From this theoretical framework we derive some recommendations that could be useful in deciding on how to implement this idea."
  • Contact Info

  • Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis
    513 N. Park Avenue
    Bloomington, IN 47408
    812-855–0441
    workshop @ iu . edu
    https://ostromworkshop.indiana.edu/

  • Library Technologies
    Wells Library W501
    1320 E. Tenth Street
    Bloomington, IN 47405
    libauto @ iu . edu

  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Copyright © 2024 The Trustees of Indiana University