Book

Permanent link for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2

Browse By

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder
(Routledge, 2009) Nitzan, Jonathan; Bichler, Shimshon
"Conventional theories of capitalism are mired in a deep crisis: after centuries of debate, they are still unable to tell us what capital is. Liberals and Marxists both think of capital as an economic entity that they count in universal units of utils or abstract labour, respectively. But these units are totally fictitious. Nobody has ever been able to observe or measure them, and for a good reason: they dont exist. Since liberalism and Marxism depend on these nonexisting units, their theories hang in suspension. They cannot explain the process that matters most the accumulation of capital. This book offers a radical alternative. According to the authors, capital is not a narrow economic entity, but a symbolic quantification of power. It has little to do with utility or abstract labour, and it extends far beyond machines and production lines. Capital, the authors claim, represents the organized power of dominant capital groups to reshape or creorder their society."
Mysteries and Myths: De Soto, Property and Poverty in South Africa
(International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 2006) Kingwill, Rosalee; Cousins, Ben; Cousins, Tessa; Hornby, Donna; Royston, Lauren; Royston, Lauren
"Hernando De Soto’s influential book The Mystery of Capital offers a simple yet beguiling message: capitalism can be made to work for the poor through formalising their property rights in houses, land and small businesses. Yet this paper presents evidence from South Africa to suggest that many of de Soto’s policy prescriptions may be inappropriate for the poorest and most vulnerable, and could have negative impacts on their security and well-being. The authors draw on case studies and the literature to show that: • Titling does not necessarily increase tenure security or certainty; in many cases it does the opposite. • Formalisation of property rights does not promote lending to the poor. Rather than turning their property into ‘capital’, formalisation could increase the rate of homelessness. • Formalisation through registered title deeds creates unaffordable costs for many poor people. • Informal property systems currently support a vibrant rental market; formalisa- tion could undermine this, producing unintended negative consequences for the poor. • ‘The poor’ are not homogeneous and those in the extra-legal sector should be differentiated according to income and vulnerability status. • Such an approach does not mesh with rural common property resources which are never exclusive to one person, and which have fluid boundaries and flexible rules."

Browse By

Browsing Book by Subject "capitalism"