| dc.contributor.author |
Shackelford, Scott |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Russell, Scott |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-25T21:14:49Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2017-01-25T21:14:49Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2016 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/10255 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"Although much work has been done on applying the law of warfare to cyber attacks, far less attention has been paid to defining a law of cyber peace applicable below the armed attack threshold. Among the most important unanswered questions is what exactly nations’ due diligence obligations are to one another and to the private sector, as well as how these obligations should be translated into policy. In this Article, we analyze how both the United States and the European Union are operationalizing the concept of cybersecurity due diligence, and then move on to investigate a menu of options presented to the European Parliament in November 2015 by the authors to further refine and apply this concept." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
cybersecurity |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Operationalizing Cybersecurity Due Diligence: A Transatlantic Comparative Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Information & Knowledge |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationjournal |
South Carolina Law Review |
en_US |