| dc.contributor.author |
Klooster, Dan |
en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2009-07-31T14:34:04Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2009-07-31T14:34:04Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
1998 |
en_US |
| dc.date.submitted |
2001-07-02 |
en_US |
| dc.date.submitted |
2001-07-02 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/1064 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"Change in the commons is poorly understood. After considering developments of theory on common pool resource management, this essay analyzes a comparative case study of community forestry in Mexico. It contrasts a community suffering from corruption in the logging business and timber smuggling with a set of forestry communities having institutions able to control these issues. A discussion assesses the utility of institutional choice models for change in the commons, and draws out implications for theory building and analysis." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
IASC |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
forest management |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
institutional design |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
rational choice theory |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
community forestry--case studies |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
timber |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
landscape change |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Institutional Choice, or a Process of Struggle? A Case Study of Forest Co-Management in Mexico |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Conference Paper |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
unpublished |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.region |
Central America & Caribbean |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Forestry |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconference |
Crossing Boundaries, the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfdates |
June 10-14 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationconfloc |
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
en_US |
| dc.submitter.email |
hess@indiana.edu |
en_US |