Image Database Export Citations


Regulation of Common Land under the Commons Act 1876: Central and Local Perspectives

Show full item record

Type: Conference Paper
Author: Straughton, Eleanor A.
Conference: Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons
Location: Cheltenham, England
Conf. Date: July 14-18, 2008
Date: 2008
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10535/1367
Sector: Land Tenure & Use
Region: Europe
Subject(s): common pool resources
land tenure and use
governance and politics
customary law
Abstract: "In a departure from decades of enclosure legislation in England and Wales, the Commons Act 1876 made provision for statutory regulation of common land: a reflection of the legislature's growing interest in preserving and improving--rather than extinguishing--the nation's surviving common lands. "For those landowners and commoners who applied for and were granted local regulation acts and awards, this process established a new management framework, with the introduction of 'stinting' schedules (apportioning a certain number of common rights to each commoner), and boards of 'conservators' with powers to make byelaws. For some communities, regulation under the Commons Act 1876 promised to fill the legal vacuum afflicting common land management since the decay of their traditional management institution, the manor court; at the same time, the concept of a management body with byelaw-making powers suggested some form of continuity with the past, and could be expected to borrow from a tradition of manorial and village byelaws regulating the exercise of common rights. "However, as surviving documentation shows, the purpose and scope of conservators' powers became a major point of debate between the central legislature and commoners, raising important questions over the efficacy of applying an external statutory solution to local management problems. "Using cases from around the country, this paper explores the way in which interpretation of the Commons Act 1876 differed between the Home Office, which envisaged conservators' powers as primarily directed towards the common as a public space, and landowners and commoners who envisaged regulation as a means to more closely define and manage agricultural use of common land. In doing so, the paper points to a difficult meeting between two commons cultures, and between two legal traditions--one customary, and one statutory--as exhibited on commons regulated in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries."

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
_Straughton_145401.pdf 147.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show full item record