Image Database Export Citations


The Question of Scale in Integrated Natural Resource Management

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lovell, Chris en_US
dc.contributor.author Mandondo, Alois en_US
dc.contributor.author Moriarty, Patrick en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:53:32Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:53:32Z
dc.date.issued 2002 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-08-09 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2007-08-09 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/2766
dc.description.abstract "Lessons from integrated natural resource management (INRM) practiced at different scales are reviewed, with a focus on catchment management. INRM is complex, and many interactions have to be addressed. Consequently, the scale of investigation can restrict the generality and utility of the findings. Examples show that temporal, biophysical, and institutional scales can each be critical. Contexts and dynamics associated with particular scales, and interactions or lateral flows that become important with increasing scale, also pose serious challenges. A conceptual framework is presented for scaling issues in INRM and how to deal with them. To benefit many people over large areas within sensible time frames requires considerable political will, investment, and strategic planning from the outset. Only then will an enabling environment be created to meet a range of preconditions identified in previous studies of integrated catchment management, watershed development, common property management, and devolution. This paper focuses on the links between the organizational/human aspects and the biophysical/ technical perspective of various scaling issues. In particular, there is a need to reconcile current top-down and bottom-up approaches, both of which are needed to achieve effective delivery in structured programs beyond the scale of a few villages or isolated success stories. Options for bridging this gap are discussed and recommendations are made for research that might be undertaken. Action research is recommended to enable learning-by-doing, and should focus at two levels: strategic studies to help create the political and institutional landscapes required for scaling-up; and specific studies of gaps in knowledge, in particular, programs that account for scale issues. These suggestions are illustrated using the example of groundwater management via nested scales of interdisciplinary research." en_US
dc.subject common pool resources--theory en_US
dc.subject scale en_US
dc.subject natural resources en_US
dc.subject resource management--theory en_US
dc.subject community participation en_US
dc.subject devolution en_US
dc.title The Question of Scale in Integrated Natural Resource Management en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.subject.sector Theory en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 5 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 2 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth January en_US
dc.submitter.email efcastle@indiana.edu en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
question_of_scale.pdf 325.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record