hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Social Fences, Mental Fences: Contrasting Approaches to Range Management in Southern Lesotho and the Eastern Cape

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ntshona, Zolile en_US
dc.contributor.author Turner, Stephen en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T15:12:42Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T15:12:42Z
dc.date.issued 2000 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-06-29 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2009-06-29 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4097
dc.description.abstract "Extensive livestock production remains a significant part of livelihoods in many parts of southern Africa where land is not held in freehold, including Lesotho and the former 'homeland' of Transkei, now part of the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. In such areas, sustainable livestock production requires some form of community based range management. Based on field research and project support work in the Maluti District of the former Transkei and the Mohale's Hoek and Quthing Districts of southern Lesotho, this paper explores the contrasting views of community based range management that prevail in the two countries. It aims to reveal the social and economic tensions that exist between social fencing approaches and metal fencing approaches, and to highlight the different perceptions of governance and institutional roles that result from the two countries' political experiences over the 20th century. This comparative discussion should yield policy lessons for both countries, and the wider region. "The Drakensberg escarpment separates two very different experiences of governance and resource management in these two areas. In southern Lesotho, chiefs continue to play a strong role in local government and natural resource management. Cattle, sheep and goats still play an important role in local livelihoods. Livestock are herded by boys and young men. Grazing areas, demarcated by natural features or beacons, are unfenced. They are opened and closed by the chiefs sitting in council with senior men of the community, who also punish infringements of local range management rules. Like their Xhosa-speaking neighbours in the former Transkei homeland area of the Eastern Cape, Basotho have suffered heavily from stock theft over the past decade. Each side blames the other for most of this crime and violence. In the former Transkei, local governance and land management were perverted and distorted by the 'betterment' resettlement and planning programme of the apartheid era. This programme divided grazing lands into fenced camps that were administered by government in association with officially approved headmen. Herding of livestock has become uncommon in these areas, where most of the 'betterment' grazing fences have now disappeared and where governance has become increasingly uncertain since the advent of democracy in 1994. Many people in these communal areas of the Eastern Cape look back to the comparative order and good management of the 'betterment' era with nostalgia, and are calling for government to restore the fences. There is little prospect in these areas of the social fencing that comparatively vigorous local governance in Lesotho continues to enforce--although the future of these Basotho institutions is uncertain too." en_US
dc.subject livestock en_US
dc.subject rangelands en_US
dc.subject herders en_US
dc.subject social networks en_US
dc.subject resource management--comparative analysis en_US
dc.title Social Fences, Mental Fences: Contrasting Approaches to Range Management in Southern Lesotho and the Eastern Cape en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US
dc.coverage.region Africa en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Grazing en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Social_Fences_m ... sotho_and_eastern_cape.pdf 147.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record