Image Database Export Citations


The Practice of Transboundary Decision Making on the Incomati River: Elucidating Underlying Factors and their Implications for Institutional Design

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Slinger, Jill H.
dc.contributor.author Hilders, Marianne
dc.contributor.author Juizo, Dinis
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-26T19:30:39Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-26T19:30:39Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5620
dc.description.abstract "The Incomati River Basin is shared by Mozambique, South Africa, and Swaziland. In August 2002, the groundbreaking 'Tripartite Interim Agreement on Water Sharing of the Maputo and Incomati Rivers' (the IncoMaputo agreement) was signed. Following reports that the use, availability, and adequacy of information posed problems for future decision making on this transboundary river, the Delft University of Technology initiated a 6-month study in 2003 in which 25 southern African researchers and officials were interviewed. The Joint Incomati Basin Study formed a central component in the investigation, because it was viewed by the parties involved as a successful experience that paved the way for the IncoMaputo agreement. Knowledge of the role that information played in this process and how decision making occurred was collated and analyzed. Network theory provided the guiding theoretical framework in interpreting the results. A number of problems related to information use in decision making were identified. More importantly, a web of underlying causes was identified, such as cultural and language differences, differences in perception, inadequacy of stakeholder involvement, variability in political commitment, lack of capacity, absence of operational experience, the weak mandate of the international decision-making body, and the paradoxical South AfricanMozambican relationship. Two groups of factors in this web were identified as needing to change if the management of this transboundary river is to comply with the IncoMaputo agreement, namely the situational or institutional factors and the cognitive factors (particularly the perceptions each country holds of the other and the way they treat one another). Our analysis shows that, contrary to current international practice, when designing international institutional arrangements for water management, the sociopolitical interface should be considered as important as information flow to the water managers." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject causal theory en_US
dc.subject decision making en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.subject information en_US
dc.subject institutions en_US
dc.subject water management--policy en_US
dc.subject river basins en_US
dc.subject networks en_US
dc.title The Practice of Transboundary Decision Making on the Incomati River: Elucidating Underlying Factors and their Implications for Institutional Design en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region Africa en_US
dc.coverage.country South Africa, Swaziland en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Water Resource & Irrigation en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 15 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 1 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth January en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2009-3070.pdf 508.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record