Image Database Export Citations


Common-Pool Resource Theory

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schlager, Edella
dc.contributor.editor Durant, R. F.
dc.contributor.editor Fiorino, D. J.
dc.contributor.editor O'Leary, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-19T18:25:14Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-19T18:25:14Z
dc.date.issued 2004 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5648
dc.description.abstract From p. 146: "The Australian fishers are not like Hardin's herders. They have avoided a tragedy of the commons. Why have Australian, but not New England, fishers figured a way out of their tragedy? Hardin's model cannot account for such success; it predicts failure. Until recently, if one turned to the very best scholarly work, one would find only explanations and predictions of failure. This chapter argues, however, that this attitude is beginning to change. Over the past fifteen years, scholars and practitioners have concluded that the tragedy of the commons is no longer the only model available to account for human use of common-pool resources." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.publisher MIT Press (Manuscript Draft) en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries American and Comparative Environmental Policy en_US
dc.subject common pool resources en_US
dc.subject tragedy of the commons en_US
dc.subject Ostrom, Elinor en_US
dc.subject design principles en_US
dc.subject cooperation en_US
dc.title Common-Pool Resource Theory en_US
dc.type Book Chapter en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.type.methodology Theory en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.coverage.country New England en_US
dc.subject.sector Theory en_US
dc.identifier.citationpages 145-175 en_US
dc.identifier.citationpubloc Cambridge, MA en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Common-pool Resource Theory.pdf 1.044Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record