| dc.contributor.author |
Weiser, Philip J. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Hadfield, Dale N. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-09-09T15:00:33Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-09-09T15:00:33Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2008 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/6262 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"This article addresses three central questions that confront the design and implementation of property rights in spectrum. First, it suggests how policymakers must develop a set of rights and remedies around spectrum property rights that reflect the fact that radio signals defy boundaries and can propagate in unpredictable ways. In particular, if policymakers simply created rights in spectrum and enforced them like rights in land (i.e., with injunctions for trespass), they would invite strategic behavior: spectrum speculators would buy licenses for the sole purpose of suing other licensees when their transmission systems created interference outside the permissible boundary (i.e., act as spectrum trolls). Second, it rejects the suggestion that policymakers establish a unitary property right for spectrum, arguing that policymakers should zone the spectrum by establishing different levels of protection against interference (i.e., an ability to transmit signals with more latitude) in different frequency bands. Finally, this Article discusses what institutional strategy will best facilitate the development of the property right and its enforcement, concluding that an administrative agency - be it a new one or a reformed FCC - is better positioned than a court to develop and enforce the rules governing the use of spectrum so as to facilitate technological progress and prevent parties with antiquated equipment from objecting to more efficient uses of spectrum." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
property rights |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Coase theorem |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
telecommunications |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Spectrum Policy Reform and the Next Frontier of Property Rights |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
| dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
Information & Knowledge |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationjournal |
George Mason Law Review |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationvolume |
15 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationpages |
549-609 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationnumber |
3 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citationmonth |
March |
en_US |