|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Conference Paper |
|
Author:
|
Koontz, Tomas; Sen, Sevaly |
|
Conference:
|
Sustaining Commons: Sustaining Our Future, the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons |
|
Location:
|
Hyderabad, India |
|
Conf. Date:
|
January 10-14 |
|
Date:
|
2011 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/7184
|
|
Sector:
|
Water Resource & Irrigation |
|
Region:
|
Middle East & South Asia
North America |
|
Subject(s):
|
decentralization
institutions
community development
water management
|
|
Abstract:
|
"Decentralization is not a binary phenomenon. When central governments
decentralize natural resource management, they often retain an interest in the success of the local efforts to solve natural resource problems. As such, many communities have seen continued central government investments in 'decentralized' programs. These outside investments can serve an important role in moving community-based efforts forward. At the same time, they can represent risks to the community if government resources are not stable over time. Our focus in
this paper is on the effects of withdrawal of government resources from community-based natural resource management. A critical question is how to build institutional capacity to carry on when the government funding runs out. This study compares coping strategies used by community-based project leaders in two different contexts, India and the United States. Results indicate important differences linked to livelihoods, existing institutions, and community
participation."
|