| dc.description.abstract |
"Historically, pastoral people were able to more freely use the services their semi-arid and
arid ecosystems provide, and they adapted to changes in ways that improved their well-being. More recently,
their ability to adapt has been constrained due to changes from within and from outside their communities.
To compare possible responses by pastoral communities, we modeled ecosystem services and tied those
services to decisions that people make at the household level. We created an agent-based household model
called DECUMA, joined that model with the ecosystem model SAVANNA, and applied the linked models
to southeastern Kajiado District, Kenya. The structure of the new agent-based model and linkages between
the models are described, and then we demonstrate the model results using a scenario that shows changes
in Maasai well-being in response to drought. We then explore two additional but related scenarios,
quantifying household well-being if access to a grazing reserve is lost and if access is lost but those most
affected are compensated. In the second scenario, households in group ranches abutting the grazing reserve
that lost access had large declines in livestock populations, less food energy from animal sources, increased
livestock sales and grain purchases, and increased need for supplemental foods. Households in more distant
areas showed no changes or had increases in livestock populations because their herds had fewer animals
with which to compete for forage. When households neighboring the grazing reserve were compensated
for the lease of the lands they had used, they prospered. We describe some benefits and limitations of the
agent-based approach." |
en_US |