|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Conference Paper |
|
Author:
|
Agarwal, Bina |
|
Conference:
|
Inequality, Collective Action and Environmental Sustainability |
|
Location:
|
Santa Fe, New Mexico |
|
Conf. Date:
|
21-23 September |
|
Date:
|
2005 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/7900
|
|
Sector:
|
General & Multiple Resources
Social Organization |
|
Region:
|
Middle East & South Asia |
|
Subject(s):
|
sustainability
gender
cooperation
inequality
norms
social behavior
governance and politics
common pool resources
collective action
decision making
|
|
Abstract:
|
"This paper examines the effects of gender inequality on prospects of cooperation and environmental sustainability. Gender inequality is a form of inequality that is interactive with but distinct from other forms of economic and social inequalities. It dwells not only outside the household but also centrally within it. It stems not only from pre-existing differences in economic endowments between women and men, but also from pre-existing gendered social norms and social perceptions; that is, the inequality is also ideologically embedded. And it not only pre-exists in the noted forms, but can also arise from newly defined rules and procedures that structure the functioning of the governance institution itself. All three dimensions of gender inequality can impinge on prospects for cooperation and efficient local commons management; and all are largely neglected in collective action literature on the commons. The paper also distinguishes between voluntary and nonvoluntary cooperation arguing that cooperation need not always be a voluntary act. Cooperation may 'appear' to exist despite inequalities and conflicts of interest within a community, because it is imposed by some on others through the exercise of social and/or economic power. The paper analyzes how these different aspects of gender inequality can impinge on collective action and the form it takes (voluntary or nonvoluntary), and the likely outcomes for environmental sustainability. It does so by analyzing the experience of community forest management across India, drawing also on the author's recent field data from western India. In addition, based on the latter, it empirically tests the effects on rule formulation and forest quality of women's greater inclusion in the decision-making process of local commons governance."
|