hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Indigenous Territories in the USA and Brazil: Comparative Perspectives on Governance and Management Issues

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wentzel, Sondra en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-07-31T14:32:32Z
dc.date.available 2009-07-31T14:32:32Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2008-11-11 en_US
dc.date.submitted 2008-11-11 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/835
dc.description.abstract "The situation of indigenous peoples in the USA and Brazil, despite all obvious differences, has a number of interesting parallels seldom explored because of the divide between North and South. Indigenous peoples in both countries are many and diverse but usually rather small, making up only a tiny part of the national population (<1%). In contrast, their territories occupy a considerable portion of each country's area (4.2% USA, 12.6% Brazil) and are of increasing economic interest because of their natural resources. Moreover, 'Indian Reservations' (USA) and 'Indigenous Lands' ('Terras Indigenas', Brazil) are both areas claimed by the respective nation state as federal lands and held in trust by special federal agencies, but are reserved for the permanent and exclusive use by their indigenous inhabitants. They can thus be classified and analyzed as a specific type of commons. "Over the last decades, significant changes have occurred in the governance and management regimes of indigenous territories in both countries. In the USA, since the 1975 Indian Self-Determination Act, the keywords have been 'tribal sovereignty' and 'tribal self-governance', and new relationships between the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the different tribal governments are being negotiated. In Brazil, the 1988 Constitution reconfirmed the responsibility of the state to demarcate and protect indigenous territories and recognized indigenous peoples rights to culturally specific forms of social organization. However, despite considerable advances in the legal recognition of indigenous territories, institutional arrangements for their protection and management hardly exist, indigenous peoples rights to most economic uses of their lands are not regulated, and the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI) has only recently started to reconsider its traditionally rather paternalistic role. The paper will report on first results of an ongoing comparative study on these issues, designed to provide inputs for Brazilian and other Latin American indigenist policies." en_US
dc.subject indigenous institutions en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use en_US
dc.subject IASC en_US
dc.title Indigenous Territories in the USA and Brazil: Comparative Perspectives on Governance and Management Issues en_US
dc.type Conference Paper en_US
dc.type.published unpublished en_US
dc.coverage.region North America en_US
dc.coverage.region South America en_US
dc.coverage.country United States, Brazil en_US
dc.subject.sector Social Organization en_US
dc.subject.sector Land Tenure & Use en_US
dc.identifier.citationconference Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdates July 14-18, 2008 en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfloc Cheltenham England en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Wentzel_229601.pdf 263.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record