hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

The Social Dimensions of Sustainability and Change in Diversified Farming Systems

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bacon, Christopher M.
dc.contributor.author Getz, Christy
dc.contributor.author Kraus, Sibella
dc.contributor.author Montenegro, Maywa
dc.contributor.author Holland, Kaelin
dc.date.accessioned 2013-01-14T21:13:40Z
dc.date.available 2013-01-14T21:13:40Z
dc.date.issued 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/8701
dc.description.abstract "Agricultural systems are embedded in wider social-ecological processes that must be considered in any complete discussion of sustainable agriculture. Just as climatic profiles will influence the future viability of crops, institutions, i.e., governance agreements, rural household and community norms, local associations, markets, and agricultural ministries, to name but a few, create the conditions that foster sustainable food systems. Because discussions of agricultural sustainability often overlook the full range of social dimensions, we propose a dual focus on a broad set of criteria, i.e., human health, labor, democratic participation, resiliency, biological and cultural diversity, equity, and ethics, to assess social outcomes, and on institutions that could support diversified farming systems (DFS). A comparative analysis of case studies from California’s Central Valley, Mesoamerican coffee agroforestry systems, and European Union agricultural parks finds that DFS practices are unevenly adopted within and among these systems and interdependent with institutional environments that specifically promote diversified farming practices. Influential institutions in these cases include state policies, farmers’ cooperatives/associations, and organized civic efforts to influence agroenvironmental policy, share knowledge, and shape markets for more ‘sustainable’ products. The Californian and Mesoamerican cases considers organic and fair trade certifications, finding that although they promote several DFS practices and generate social benefits, they are inadequate as a single strategy to promote agricultural sustainability. The complex governance and multifunctional management of Europe’s peri-urban agricultural parks show unexpected potential for promoting DFS. Unless DFS are anchored in supportive institutions and evaluated against an inclusive set of social and environmental criteria, short-term investments to advance diversified agriculture could miss a valuable opportunity to connect ecological benefits with social benefits in the medium and long terms." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject parks en_US
dc.subject agriculture en_US
dc.subject sustainability en_US
dc.subject organic farming en_US
dc.title The Social Dimensions of Sustainability and Change in Diversified Farming Systems en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.coverage.region Central America & Caribbean en_US
dc.coverage.region South America en_US
dc.subject.sector Agriculture en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 17 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 4 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth December en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2012-5226.pdf 276.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record