hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Evaluating Consent and Legitimacy Amongst Shifting Community Norms: An EVE Online Case Study

Show full item record

Type: Journal Article
Author: Suzor, Nicolas; Woodford, Darryl
Journal: Journal of Virtual Worlds Research
Volume: 6
Page(s):
Date: 2013
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10535/9136
Sector: Information & Knowledge
Social Organization
Region:
Subject(s): community
norms
Internet
Abstract: "The legitimate resolution of disputes in online environments requires a complex understanding of the social norms of the community. The conventional legal approach to resolving disputes through literal interpretation of the contractual terms of service is highly problematic because it does not take into account potential conflict with community expectations. In this paper we examine the importance of consent to community governance and argue that a purely formal evaluation of consent is insufficient to legitimately resolve disputes. As online communities continue to grow in importance to the lives of their participants, the importance of resolving disputes legitimately, with reference to the consent of the community, will also continue to grow. We present a case study of botting and real money trading in EVE Online that highlights the dynamic interaction of community norms and private governance processes. Through this case study, we argue that the major challenge facing regulators of online environments is that community norms are complex, contested, and continuously evolving. Developing legitimate regulatory frameworks then depends on the ability of regulators to create efficient and acceptable modes of dispute resolution that can take into account (and acceptably resolve) the tension between formal contractual rules and complex and conflicting community understandings of acceptable behaviour."

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
6409-29029-3-PB.pdf 952.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show full item record