dc.contributor.author |
Sharma, A. R. |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-07-31T14:33:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-07-31T14:33:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
en_US |
dc.date.submitted |
2002-11-08 |
en_US |
dc.date.submitted |
2002-11-08 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/964 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
"This article assesses validity of the blame 'Community Forestry discriminates against the lower caste and economically disadvantaged people in Nepal'. Case studies, using two sets of database on the Forest User Groups (FUGs) of Lalitpur and Kabhrepalanchok Districts revealed that People have benefited from Community Forests regardless of wealth and caste through augmented supply of forest products for farm-household activities. The paper recommends for the continuation of subsistence oriented Community Forestry Policies in Nepal." |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
en_US |
dc.subject |
IASC |
en_US |
dc.subject |
common pool resources |
en_US |
dc.subject |
community forestry--case studies |
en_US |
dc.subject |
caste system |
en_US |
dc.subject |
forest policy |
en_US |
dc.title |
Community Forestry from Wealth and Caste Perspective: Elivra Graner in the Dock |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference Paper |
en_US |
dc.type.published |
unpublished |
en_US |
dc.coverage.region |
Middle East & South Asia |
en_US |
dc.coverage.country |
Nepal |
en_US |
dc.subject.sector |
Forestry |
en_US |
dc.subject.sector |
Social Organization |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconference |
The Commons in an Age of Globalisation, the Ninth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconfdates |
June 17-21, 2002 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationconfloc |
Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe |
en_US |
dc.submitter.email |
jerwolfe@indiana.edu |
en_US |