Image Database Export Citations


Advocacy Coalitions, REDD+, and Forest Governance in Papua New Guinea: How Likely is Transformational Change?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Babon, Andrea
dc.contributor.author McIntyre, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Gowae, Gail Y.
dc.contributor.author Gallemore, Caleb
dc.contributor.author Carmenta, Rachel
dc.contributor.author Di Gregorio, Monica
dc.contributor.author Brockhaus, Maria
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-30T19:05:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-30T19:05:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/9685
dc.description.abstract "Tropical forests in developing countries are increasingly being valued for their role in carbon sequestration. Such interest is reflected in the emergence of international initiatives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). REDD+ requires addressing both tropical forests as complex social-ecological systems and the multiple sectors involved in tropical forest resources, which may necessitate transformational change away from business-as-usual approaches to forest governance. We studied the potential for REDD+ to mobilize an influential coalition of actors promoting transformational change in forest governance in Papua New Guinea (PNG), a leading proponent of REDD+ internationally. Combining policy network approaches with the advocacy coalition framework, we identified four advocacy coalitions in the REDD+ policy domain in PNG and estimated the influence of each coalition. We found the most influential advocacy coalition is promoting the status quo rather than governance reforms capable of reducing deforestations and forest degradation, leading us to suggest that business as usual is the dominant perspective in the REDD+ policy domain in PNG. This may explain why, despite the large amount of REDD+ rhetoric, there has been only modest change in formal policy or practice in PNG to date. However, we did find influential coalitions calling for transformational change. Although these are currently minority coalitions, we identified several pathways through which they could increase their power to realize transformational change." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject forests en_US
dc.subject governance and politics en_US
dc.subject REDD en_US
dc.title Advocacy Coalitions, REDD+, and Forest Governance in Papua New Guinea: How Likely is Transformational Change? en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Theory en_US
dc.coverage.region Pacific and Australia en_US
dc.coverage.country Papua New Guinea en_US
dc.subject.sector Forestry en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 19 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 3 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth September en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2013-6486.pdf 333.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record