Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs, Perceived Drivers, and Sustainability in Contrasting Agroecosystems in Central Mexico

dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Esquivel, Carlos E.
dc.contributor.authorGavito, Mayra E.
dc.contributor.authorAstier, Marta
dc.contributor.authorCadena-Salgado, Martin
dc.contributor.authordel-Val, Ek
dc.contributor.authorVillamil-Echeverri, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMerlín-Uribe, Yair
dc.contributor.authorBalvanera, Patricia
dc.coverage.countryMexicoen_US
dc.coverage.regionCentral America & Caribbeanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-10T15:50:48Z
dc.date.available2015-07-10T15:50:48Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.description.abstract"The ability of agroecosystems to provide food ultimately depends on the regulating and supporting ecosystem services that underpin their functioning, such as the regulation of soil quality, water quality, soil erosion, pests, and pollinators. However, there are trade-offs between provisioning and regulating or supporting services, whose nature at the farm and plot scales is poorly understood. We analyzed data at the farm level for two agroecosystems with contrasting objectives in central Mexico: one aimed at staple crop production for self-subsistence and local markets, the other directed to a cash crop for export markets. Bivariate and multivariate trade-offs were analyzed for different crop management strategies (conventional, organic, traditional, crop rotation) and their underpinning socioeconomic drivers. There was a clear trade-off between crop yield and soil quality in self-subsistence systems. However, other expected trade-offs between yields and soil quality did not always occur, likely because of the overall good soils of the region and the low to medium input profile of most farms. Trade-offs were highly dependent on farm-specific agricultural practices; organic, traditional, and rotation management systems generally showed smaller trade-offs between yield and soil quality, pest control, and biodiversity than did conventional management systems. Perceived drivers reported by farmers included increasing prices for cash crops, rising costs of inputs, and extreme climatic events (e.g., drought, hail, frost). Farmers did not identify the regulation of soil quality, water quality, soil erosion, pests, or pollinators as important constraints. Although acceptable yields could be maintained irrespective of key regulating and supporting services according to these perceptions, current levels of soil erosion and nutrient runoff are likely to have important negative effects at the watershed scale. Sustainability in both agroecosystems could be increased substantially by promoting alternative practices aimed at maintaining biodiversity, soil quality, and soil retention."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthMarchen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/9790
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectagroecologyen_US
dc.subjectmaizeen_US
dc.subject.sectorAgricultureen_US
dc.titleEcosystem Service Trade-Offs, Perceived Drivers, and Sustainability in Contrasting Agroecosystems in Central Mexicoen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2014-6875.pdf
Size:
938.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections