Regulation of Common Land under the Commons Act 1876: Central and Local Perspectives

dc.contributor.authorStraughton, Eleanor A.en_US
dc.coverage.countryEnglanden_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:36:16Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-10en_US
dc.description.abstract"In a departure from decades of enclosure legislation in England and Wales, the Commons Act 1876 made provision for statutory regulation of common land: a reflection of the legislature's growing interest in preserving and improving--rather than extinguishing--the nation's surviving common lands. "For those landowners and commoners who applied for and were granted local regulation acts and awards, this process established a new management framework, with the introduction of 'stinting' schedules (apportioning a certain number of common rights to each commoner), and boards of 'conservators' with powers to make byelaws. For some communities, regulation under the Commons Act 1876 promised to fill the legal vacuum afflicting common land management since the decay of their traditional management institution, the manor court; at the same time, the concept of a management body with byelaw-making powers suggested some form of continuity with the past, and could be expected to borrow from a tradition of manorial and village byelaws regulating the exercise of common rights. "However, as surviving documentation shows, the purpose and scope of conservators' powers became a major point of debate between the central legislature and commoners, raising important questions over the efficacy of applying an external statutory solution to local management problems. "Using cases from around the country, this paper explores the way in which interpretation of the Commons Act 1876 differed between the Home Office, which envisaged conservators' powers as primarily directed towards the common as a public space, and landowners and commoners who envisaged regulation as a means to more closely define and manage agricultural use of common land. In doing so, the paper points to a difficult meeting between two commons cultures, and between two legal traditions--one customary, and one statutory--as exhibited on commons regulated in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJuly 14-18, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceGoverning Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocCheltenham, Englanden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1367
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectgovernance and politicsen_US
dc.subjectcustomary lawen_US
dc.subjectpastoralismen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.titleRegulation of Common Land under the Commons Act 1876: Central and Local Perspectivesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
_Straughton_145401.pdf
Size:
147.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections