Relocation from Wildlife Reserves in the Greater and Trans-Himalayas: Is it Necessary?

dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Yash Veeren_US
dc.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
dc.coverage.regionMiddle East & South Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:58:10Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:58:10Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-05-14en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-05-14en_US
dc.description.abstract"The Greater and Trans-Himalayan tracts are cold deserts that have severe seasonal and resource scarce environments. Covering the bulk of Indian Himalayas, they are a rich repository of biodiversity values and ecosystem services. The region has a large protected area (PA) network which has not been com-pletely effective in conserving these unique values. The human population densities are much lower (usually < 1 per sq km) than in most other parts of the country (over 300 to a sq km). However, even such small populations can come into conflict with strict PA laws that demand large inviolate areas, which can mainly be achieved through relocation of the scattered settlements. In this paper, I reason that in this landscape relocation is not a tenable strategy for conservation due to a variety of reasons. The primary ones are that wildlife, including highly endangered ones are pervasive in the larger landscape (unlike the habitat 'islands' of the forested ecosystems) and existing large PAs usually encompass only a small pro-portion of this range. Similarly, traditional use by people for marginal cultivation, biomass extraction and pastoralism is also as pervasive in this landscape. There does exist pockets of conflict and these are prob-ably increasing owing to a variety of changes relating to modernisation. However, scarce resources, the lack of alternatives and the traditional practice of clear-cut division of all usable areas and pastures be-tween communities make resettlement of people outside PAs extremely difficult. It is reasoned that given the widespread nature of the wildlife and pockets of relatively high density, it is important to prioritise these smaller areas for conservation in a scenario where they form a mosaic of small 'cores' that are more effectively maintained with local support and that enable wildlife to persist. These ideas have recently gained widespread acceptance in both government and conservation circles and may soon become part of national strategy for these areas."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalConservation and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJanuaryen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber3en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3181
dc.subjectwildlifeen_US
dc.subjectHimalayasen_US
dc.subjectprotected areasen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subject.sectorWildlifeen_US
dc.titleRelocation from Wildlife Reserves in the Greater and Trans-Himalayas: Is it Necessary?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cs-6-3-263[1].pdf
Size:
58.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections