The Long and the Short of the 'View Thing': A Response to: Gunderson and Folke 2000. Toward a 'science of the long view'

dc.contributor.authorTyson, Wayneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:59:25Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-06en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-06en_US
dc.description.abstract"It certainly is high-time that additional emphasis was placed on the need for studies, of any length, that are congruent with the 'length' (or 'dimensions') of the subject phenomena. It is time, in fact, for a concerted opposition by intellectual consortia such as Conservation Ecology to the institutional and other control-obsessed elements in academia and 'corporatia' that consciously or unconsciously plan for still-born and vacant exercises that are prematurely terminated by the arbitrary boundaries of summer breaks or granting bodies."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber2en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/3291
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectecologyen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleThe Long and the Short of the 'View Thing': A Response to: Gunderson and Folke 2000. Toward a 'science of the long view'en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
30.pdf
Size:
91.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections