Some Reservations about the Gap Concept: A response to: Bradshaw and Borchers. 2000. 'Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-Policy Gap'

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorStilgoe, Jacken_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:55:37Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-12-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract"Although Bradshaw and Borchers (2000) have made an admirable attempt to conceptualize the myriad problems of scientific uncertainty in policy, I have some serious reservations about the representation of the sciencepolicy gap as a lag in public confidence. Recent developments in science studies have shown that to know science is not necessarily to love it."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthOctoberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber2en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2955
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectinformationen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleSome Reservations about the Gap Concept: A response to: Bradshaw and Borchers. 2000. 'Uncertainty as Information: Narrowing the Science-Policy Gap'en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
30.pdf
Size:
101.49 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Journal Article