Water Users Association in Madagascar: Why Does it Fail?

dc.contributor.authorGastineau, Pascalen_US
dc.coverage.countryMadagascaren_US
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:30:40Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-05-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-05-16en_US
dc.description.abstract"In European countries, markets are well developed and governments relatively efficient to correct their failures. The set of social dilemmas communities face is thus relatively limited. In developing economies the opposite is true: missing markets and poorly performing governments leave communities with a much wider range of social dilemmas. "This paper discusses implementation of new irrigation systems management in Madagascar (smallholder rice economy). We particularly focus on the role of farmers in irrigation management and development of farmers' organisation. Madagascar's government (as many others governments around the world) has adopted a program to devolve responsibility for irrigation management to Water Users Associations (WUA). This reform was mainly driven by government fiscal shortages and inability to raise sufficient revenues from collection of water charges. Decentralization and devolution of water resources management should increase water user participation in decision-making and investment, and improve management incentives, accountability, agricultural and economic productivity and cost recovery. This development tool is a participatory, bottom-up concept which has received particular attention in recent decades. The major benefit of such a program should be a more equitable water distribution among members regardless of their location, type or size of farm. Moreover, water conflicts could be dealt quickly at local level, and among one's peers if there is a Water Users Association. Other benefits include more water reliability, well-maintained canals, less water theft, and empowerment through participation. "The paper proposes an explanation of opportunistic behaviour in WUA that jeopardizes the sustainability and development of its members' welfare (watering crops without paying the water price for example). We determine the actor groups characteristics and effective institutional settings at the local level, such as limited sanctioning and enforcement mechanisms and almost no monitoring mechanisms, that provide the conditions for such a behaviour dominates. The study is based on the first results from an empirical field study in Madagascar. The discussion is based on empirical material from Ampitatafika village in the Central Highlands. Effective rules-in-use in local communities are presented. We try to explore the community's capacity to solve such a collective action problem which is critical the sustainability and development of its members' welfare. This article wonders if there are additional influencing variables that have an impact on the institutional change and constrain the emergence of collective action solutions."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMarch 23-25en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceBuilding the European Commons: From Open Fields to Open Source, European Regional Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP)en_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBrescia, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthMarchen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/553
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectwater users' associationsen_US
dc.subjecteconomic developmenten_US
dc.subjectirrigationen_US
dc.subjectriceen_US
dc.subjectdecentralizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorWater Resource & Irrigationen_US
dc.subject.sectorAgricultureen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.submitter.emailyinjin@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleWater Users Association in Madagascar: Why Does it Fail?en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gastineau.pdf
Size:
180.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections