Political and Equity Considerations in Woodland Management in Kanyati Communal Area, Zimbabwe

dc.contributor.authorNhira, Calvinen_US
dc.coverage.countryZimbabween_US
dc.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:42:40Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:42:40Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-07-25en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-07-25en_US
dc.description.abstract"This paper seeks to elaborate the factors determining the inconsistencies related to non-application and/or differential application of rules and controls among community members in a recently settled area. In the case study area context it emerged that there is a de facto management strategy adopted at the household and community levels, in the former case to act as insurance against possible depletion of community resources arid 7-1 to supply products that otherwise would not be available; in the latter case to ensure continued supply of resources from the communal woodland resource. The management strategy incorporates cultural forms of control and a project-imposed management strategy which fixed the community/political boundaries and created community resource control institutions. Households' control over their resources is tight except during the dry season when domestic livestock are not herded during which time appropriate measures are taken to protect the trees. Cultural forms of control are undermined by the absence of 'traditional' authority, short term residence in the area and antipathy to 'traditional' forms of religion. Community resource control institutions are lax and discretionary in their application of unwritten, vague but commonly understood rules and regulations to inhabitants of their locality although they are effective against those perceived to be outsiders. The rules and regulations entail the need to seek permission from elected resource overseers and/or Video chairs, not to ring bark trees,not to cut trees near river banks, and not to cut fruit trees. The sanctions that can be elected are extra work at the schools or paddocks or woodlots, imposition of a fine, or in the case of recalcitrants, eviction from the area. In some settlement schemes control of outsiders is a pernicious problem linked to claims on access by the outsiders, resource overpopulation in adjacent communal areas and commoditization of the resources."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesSeptember 17-20, 1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceInequality and the Commons, the Third Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocWashington, DCen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2131
dc.publisher.workingpaperseriesCentre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabween_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCASS Natural Resources Management Occasional Paper Seriesen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectforestryen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.titlePolitical and Equity Considerations in Woodland Management in Kanyati Communal Area, Zimbabween_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Political_and_Equity_Considerations_in_Woodland_Management_in_Kanyati_Communal_Area,_Zimbabwe.pdf
Size:
1.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections