Commons for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs): Excluded from Policy

dc.contributor.authorSarma, Sushanta Kumar
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Ishan
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-22T17:11:15Z
dc.date.available2011-03-22T17:11:15Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.description.abstract"Almost half of the displaced persons in India are tribals, most of whom are located in the natural resource-rich dryland and rain-fed areas of central Indian tribal belt and in North- Eastern region. Apart from loosing private properties, IDPs also lose access to common property resources. Commons are prime providers of food, especially for fodder and fuel wood in these areas. Small and marginal farmers and agricultural laborers are more dependent upon commons for their redistributive role. Common also add to social stickiness of communities leading to stronger social ties among them. Security of livelihoods is an important guiding principle for rehabilitation policies. The assessment of impact of displacement as stated in the rehabilitation bill (2007) includes assessment of Commons from livelihood perspective. However, the provisions for resettlement, in the bill, do not accommodate Commons as a part of compensation. In absence of any specific policy, the case for conflict-induced IDPs is even worse. Moreover, as the institutions around commons are locally embedded, they cannot be created in absence of an enabling policy framework for communities. Similarly, the access to commons of indigenous population as against IDPs is also an ambiguous area. National policies on most of the natural resources deal with the state and private control only, augmenting to the neglect of significance of Commons in all other development policies, including one for IDPs. The IFAD framework for sustainable livelihood examines the livelihood of poor by linking different elements like assets, vulnerabilities, policies etc., within a context. It examines the linkages between ‘service delivery agencies’ like institutional arrangement for commons and ‘enabling agencies’ like policy-making bodies, on livelihoods. IFAD framework can bring out the criticality of commons for IDPs. An analysis of current situations and legal-policy frameworks for resettlement in select states will help to bring out the lacunae in given agro-ecological and social contexts."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJanuary 10-14en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceSustaining Commons: Sustaining Our Future, the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocHyderabad, Indiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/7124
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectcommonsen_US
dc.subjectpolicy analysisen_US
dc.subjectlivelihoodsen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleCommons for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs): Excluded from Policyen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
936.pdf
Size:
101.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections