Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems

dc.contributor.authorLebel, Louisen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderies, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Bruceen_US
dc.contributor.authorFolke, Carlen_US
dc.contributor.authorHatfield-Dodds, Steveen_US
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Terryen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:49:37Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:49:37Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-06-15en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-06-15en_US
dc.description.abstract"The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?"en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthJuneen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume11en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2397
dc.subjectgovernance and politicsen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjectsocial-ecological systemsen_US
dc.subjectadaptive systemsen_US
dc.subjectinstitutionsen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.titleGovernance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systemsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2005-1606.pdf
Size:
529.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections