Institutional Interplay: The Environmental Consequences of Cross-Scale Interactions

dc.contributor.authorYoung, Oran R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:30:28Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.date.submitted2001-07-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2001-07-02en_US
dc.description.abstract"The boundaries separating social institutions from one another are sometimes hard to delimit with precision. Nonetheless, discrete institutions interact continually both horizontally or at the same level of social organization (e.g. interactions between trade regimes and environmental regimes at the international level) and vertically or across levels of social organization (e.g. interactions between national regulatory arrangements dealing with land use and local systems of land tenure). Focusing on issues of land use and sea use, this essay explores the consequences of vertical interplay in two distinct settings. The first setting features issues arising from the interplay between modern systems of public property articulated primarily at the national level and traditional, largely local systems rooted in practices involving common property. The second setting takes the analysis of institutional interplay to a higher level; it directs attention to regulatory regimes and examines interactions between international arrangements pertaining to the harvesting of natural resources and the management systems dealing with the same resources that operate within individual member states. The principal conclusion of the paper is that cross-scale interactions generate an inescapable tension between (1) the benefits of higher level arrangements measured in terms of opportunities to consider biophysical interdependencies and to engage in ecosystems management and (2) the costs of operating at higher levels calculated in terms of an inability to come to terms with local variations in biophysical conditions and a lack of sensitivity to the rights and interests of local stakeholders. The vigor of the debate regarding the subsidiarity principle testifies to the importance of this tension. But this debate also suggests that there is no simple criterion or formula that can be brought to bear in efforts to manage or regulate vertical interplay in these settings. Ideal responses to this institutional tension generally turn on a variety of situational factors; actual outcomes are typically products of complex political processes."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesMay 31-June 4en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceConstituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millennium, the Eighth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Propertyen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocBloomington, Indiana, USAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/519
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectscaleen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectgame theoryen_US
dc.subjecttheoryen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental policyen_US
dc.subjectsocial organizationen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional analysisen_US
dc.subjectregulationen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.submitter.emailhess@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleInstitutional Interplay: The Environmental Consequences of Cross-Scale Interactionsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
youngo041300.pdf
Size:
146.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections