Advocacy Coalitions, REDD+, and Forest Governance in Papua New Guinea: How Likely is Transformational Change?

dc.contributor.authorBabon, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGowae, Gail Y.
dc.contributor.authorGallemore, Caleb
dc.contributor.authorCarmenta, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorDi Gregorio, Monica
dc.contributor.authorBrockhaus, Maria
dc.coverage.countryPapua New Guineaen_US
dc.coverage.regionPacific and Australiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-30T19:05:35Z
dc.date.available2015-03-30T19:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.description.abstract"Tropical forests in developing countries are increasingly being valued for their role in carbon sequestration. Such interest is reflected in the emergence of international initiatives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). REDD+ requires addressing both tropical forests as complex social-ecological systems and the multiple sectors involved in tropical forest resources, which may necessitate transformational change away from business-as-usual approaches to forest governance. We studied the potential for REDD+ to mobilize an influential coalition of actors promoting transformational change in forest governance in Papua New Guinea (PNG), a leading proponent of REDD+ internationally. Combining policy network approaches with the advocacy coalition framework, we identified four advocacy coalitions in the REDD+ policy domain in PNG and estimated the influence of each coalition. We found the most influential advocacy coalition is promoting the status quo rather than governance reforms capable of reducing deforestations and forest degradation, leading us to suggest that business as usual is the dominant perspective in the REDD+ policy domain in PNG. This may explain why, despite the large amount of REDD+ rhetoric, there has been only modest change in formal policy or practice in PNG to date. However, we did find influential coalitions calling for transformational change. Although these are currently minority coalitions, we identified several pathways through which they could increase their power to realize transformational change."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthSeptemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber3en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume19en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/9685
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectforestsen_US
dc.subjectgovernance and politicsen_US
dc.subjectREDDen_US
dc.subject.sectorForestryen_US
dc.titleAdvocacy Coalitions, REDD+, and Forest Governance in Papua New Guinea: How Likely is Transformational Change?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyTheoryen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2013-6486.pdf
Size:
333.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections