Challenges in Community-Research Relationships: Learning from Natural Science in Nunavut

dc.contributor.authorGearheard, Sharien_US
dc.contributor.authorShirley, Jamalen_US
dc.coverage.countryCanadaen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:53:14Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-23en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-02-23en_US
dc.description.abstract"The context and conduct of Arctic research are changing. In Nunavut, funding agencies, licensing bodies, and new regulatory agencies established under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement require researchers to engage and consult with Inuit communities during all phases of research, to provide local training and other benefits, and to communicate project results effectively. Researchers are also increasingly expected to incorporate traditional knowledge into their work and to design studies that are relevant to local interests and needs. In this paper, we explore the challenges that researchers and communities experience in meeting these requirements by reviewing case studies of three natural science projects in Nunavut. Together, these projects exemplify both success and failure in negotiating research relationships. The case studies highlight three principal sources of researcher-community conflict: 1) debate surrounding acceptable impacts of research and the nature and extent of local benefits that research projects can and should provide; 2) uncertainty over who has the power and authority to dictate terms and conditions under which projects should be licensed; and 3) the appropriate research methodology and design to balance local expectations and research needs. The Nunavut research licensing process under the Scientists Act is an important opportunity for communities, scientists, and regulatory agencies to negotiate power relationships. However, the standards and procedures used to evaluate research impact remain unclear, as does the role of communities in the decision-making process for research licensing. The case studies also demonstrate the critical role of trust and rapport, forged through early and frequent communication, efforts to provide local training, and opportunities for community members to observe, participate in, and derive employment from project activities. Clarifying research policies in Nunavut is one step to improving relations between scientists and communities. In addition, steps need to be taken at both policy and project levels to train researchers, educate funding programs, mobilize institutions, and empower communities, thus strengthening the capacity of all stakeholders in northern research."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalArcticen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthMarchen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber1en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume60en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/2738
dc.subjectresearchen_US
dc.subjectparticipatory developmenten_US
dc.subjectscienceen_US
dc.subjectInuit (North American people)en_US
dc.subjectindigenous institutionsen_US
dc.subjecttraditional knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorInformation & Knowledgeen_US
dc.titleChallenges in Community-Research Relationships: Learning from Natural Science in Nunavuten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Arctic60-1-62.pdf
Size:
84.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Collections