Indigenous Territories in the USA and Brazil: Comparative Perspectives on Governance and Management Issues

dc.contributor.authorWentzel, Sondraen_US
dc.coverage.countryUnited States, Brazilen_US
dc.coverage.regionNorth Americaen_US
dc.coverage.regionSouth Americaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:32:32Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:32:32Z
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-11en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-11-11en_US
dc.description.abstract"The situation of indigenous peoples in the USA and Brazil, despite all obvious differences, has a number of interesting parallels seldom explored because of the divide between North and South. Indigenous peoples in both countries are many and diverse but usually rather small, making up only a tiny part of the national population (<1%). In contrast, their territories occupy a considerable portion of each country's area (4.2% USA, 12.6% Brazil) and are of increasing economic interest because of their natural resources. Moreover, 'Indian Reservations' (USA) and 'Indigenous Lands' ('Terras Indigenas', Brazil) are both areas claimed by the respective nation state as federal lands and held in trust by special federal agencies, but are reserved for the permanent and exclusive use by their indigenous inhabitants. They can thus be classified and analyzed as a specific type of commons. "Over the last decades, significant changes have occurred in the governance and management regimes of indigenous territories in both countries. In the USA, since the 1975 Indian Self-Determination Act, the keywords have been 'tribal sovereignty' and 'tribal self-governance', and new relationships between the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the different tribal governments are being negotiated. In Brazil, the 1988 Constitution reconfirmed the responsibility of the state to demarcate and protect indigenous territories and recognized indigenous peoples rights to culturally specific forms of social organization. However, despite considerable advances in the legal recognition of indigenous territories, institutional arrangements for their protection and management hardly exist, indigenous peoples rights to most economic uses of their lands are not regulated, and the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI) has only recently started to reconsider its traditionally rather paternalistic role. The paper will report on first results of an ongoing comparative study on these issues, designed to provide inputs for Brazilian and other Latin American indigenist policies."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJuly 14-18, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferenceGoverning Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commonsen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocCheltenham Englanden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/835
dc.subjectindigenous institutionsen_US
dc.subjectgovernance and politicsen_US
dc.subjectland tenure and useen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subject.sectorSocial Organizationen_US
dc.subject.sectorLand Tenure & Useen_US
dc.titleIndigenous Territories in the USA and Brazil: Comparative Perspectives on Governance and Management Issuesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wentzel_229601.pdf
Size:
263.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections