Transboundary Environmental Governance in the Mekong River Basin: Civil Society Spaces for Transboundary Participation

dc.contributor.authorWoods, Kevinen_US
dc.coverage.regionEast Asiaen_US
dc.coverage.regionMiddle East & South Asiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T14:38:29Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T14:38:29Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.date.submitted2003-09-09en_US
dc.date.submitted2003-09-09en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom Pages 1 and 2: "'New regionalism' promoted in mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) integrates the riparian nations into a coordinated Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). The GMS framework establishes the foundation for transboundary environmental governance among bilateral international donors, regional institutions, state apparatuses and local communities. With increasing market neo-liberalization to foster inter-state trading relations and concomitant development projects and natural resource exploitation, environmental concerns begin to take precedence. The Mekong River best represents the inter-relationships among nation-states, and embodies the conflict and connectedness among and within the different geopolitical scales. The geo- and cultural-politics, history and political economy of the different riparian nations must be taken into account when addressing environmental governance mechanisms. With increased regional integration, spaces for local communities become wedged between situated livelihoods and beyond national borders. Development projects in the Mekong River basin create new local and regional boundaries, inventing transnational communities. Thus spaces of maneuverability for local people become blurred and more complex by being affected by transnational environmental degradation but without regional representation to take action. The focus of this paper is on the ability for transboundary environmental governance to create avenues of action for local communities to participate in transboundary decision-making. Public participation in the regional decision-making process remains problematic as local communities constitute complexity with divergent, dynamic viewpoints. The research variables analyzed include geo-and cultural-politics, regional institutions and environmental governance mechanisms, such as transparency and access to information, accountability and public participation."en_US
dc.identifier.citationconfdatesJuly 11-14, 2003en_US
dc.identifier.citationconferencePolitics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practicesen_US
dc.identifier.citationconflocChiang Mai, Thailanden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/1653
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectIASCen_US
dc.subjectcommon pool resourcesen_US
dc.subjectMekong River regionen_US
dc.subjecttransboundary resourcesen_US
dc.subjectsocial changeen_US
dc.subjectregionalismen_US
dc.subject.sectorGlobal Commonsen_US
dc.submitter.emaillwisen@indiana.eduen_US
dc.titleTransboundary Environmental Governance in the Mekong River Basin: Civil Society Spaces for Transboundary Participationen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.type.publishedunpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kevin_Woods.pdf
Size:
160.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections