The Ghost of Development Past: The Impact of Economic Security Policies on Saami Pastoral Ecosystems

dc.contributor.authorHausner, Vera H.
dc.contributor.authorFauchald, Per
dc.contributor.authorTveraa, Torkild
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorJernsletten, Johnny-Leo
dc.contributor.authorUlvevadet, Birgitte
dc.contributor.authorIms, Rolf A.
dc.contributor.authorYoccoz, Nigel G.
dc.contributor.authorBråthen, Kari Anne
dc.coverage.countryNorwayen_US
dc.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-25T13:47:25Z
dc.date.available2011-10-25T13:47:25Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.description.abstract"To ensure economic viability over time, any efforts to meet the Millennium Development Goals need to reconcile conservation with development interventions. Particularly, in marginal and risk prone areas erosion of resilience could make production systems more susceptible to environmental risks that compromise the economic security. By longitudinal analyses of long-term data records we investigated the impacts of big push policies on Saami pastoral ecosystems in Arctic Norway. The big push was accompanied by reindeer herd accumulation and a corresponding degradation of resilience, increasing the susceptibility to herd losses to predators and adverse winters. For the last 20 years the Norwegian government has worked to halt degradation of pasture ecosystems and reduce susceptibility to environmental risks. These intended win-win policies have mainly been based on economic incentives, which have been developed together with Saami pastoralists through negotiated agreements. We argue that the continued degradation of the Saami pastoral ecosystems is a 'ghost of the development past', as the big push policies have resulted in an economic security trap (EST). The gradual reduction of resilience has persisted as the ex post payments of disaster relief and predator compensation have impeded the long-term actions to reduce susceptibility to environmental risks, i.e., ex ante policies, thereby increasing dependency on elevated economic inputs to manage the risks. The transfer of liability for managing risks to the benefactor, both through ex ante and ex post policies, has further discouraged and constrained opportunities for adaptation by the pastoralists."en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournalEcology and Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citationmonthSeptemberen_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber3en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10535/7636
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.subjectdevelopment--policyen_US
dc.subjecteconomicsen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectrisken_US
dc.subjectpastoralismen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjectSámi (European people)en_US
dc.subject.sectorGrazingen_US
dc.titleThe Ghost of Development Past: The Impact of Economic Security Policies on Saami Pastoral Ecosystemsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.methodologyCase Studyen_US
dc.type.publishedpublisheden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ES-2011-4193.pdf
Size:
852.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections